RHETORIC: IT’S OKAY TO BE WHITE?

Several years ago, a brilliant campaign was launched to expose anti-Whites. The strategy was simple. Flyers with the statement “It’s Okay to be White” were plastered in public places all across the US. The flyers would not have anything else printed on them. No names of websites, no logos of organizations. Nothing that would allow the anti-White media  to distract the public with. The plan worked brilliantly, with anchormen and women across the country calling the flyers, and those who had placed them, the r-word. Like clockwork, the media and other antiWhite institutions fumbled the football and exposed their genocidal hatred of European peoples.  

While this strategy was brilliant, it is time to shift gears. “It’s Okay to be White” will always have its place in history, and the campaign could not have emerged at a better time. That being said, there are some very serious rhetorical and psychological weaknesses to this statement. In the face of vile, genocidal hatred, simply stating “It’s Okay to be White” not only lacks the assertion we need, but comes across as moral pleading. It is as if we are saying to those who hate us and want us all dead, “Come on guy, there really isn’t anything wrong with being White. Why don’t you like us? Come on, please stop.” It is as if we are begging to be liked by people who have nothing but contempt for us. This strategy has never worked for the libertarians currently running the Republican party, and it isn’t going to work for us. It is time to shift gears and rearrange this wording to assert our moral authority, not to plead that people accept it. 
 
In its place, the phrase “It’s Not Okay to be Anti-White” should be adopted. Not only does this statement make an assertive demand based on moral authority, but it comes from a place of strength. If repeated often enough by enough by our people, it will slowly begin to penetrate the minds of the masses in a Pavlovian fashion, who will before long begin to parrot it when confronted by anti-Whites. This could have a very startling effect, as most people – including antiwhites – are not used to being put on the defensive. It is likely to even scare them and make them stutter over what they are saying. Anti-Whites are NPC’s who have memorized a very consistent script. This script does not have any pre-planned talking point to counter this claim. It will force them to try to justify why it is okay to be anti-White. They will point towards statistics and historical facts, claiming that they “prove” that inequality is White people’s fault. This response will set them up perfectly for what our only reply should be, “I am not your scapegoat.” Don’t even provide them time to finish what they are attempting to explain about their ill-informed understanding of inequality. Interrupt them immediately and repeatedly with “I am not your scapegoat and this is not acceptable. It is not okay to be anti-White.” 
 
CHECKMATE.
 
We have now achieved the moral high ground, and we have done so very simply without needing to argue the causes of inequality, which always place us at a disadvantage due to the fact that no one likes hearing the cold hard truth of the matter. This one-two punch will take us off the defensive and place us on the offensive. It provides us with the moral high ground and places anti-Whites in a position where they must begin explaining themselves. And as we know, any time you are attempting to explain yourself you are losing the argument.
 
Go on the offensive.
 
BUSINESS CARD GRAPHIC (3.5x2in)
 






FLYER





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE IDENTITARIAN POINTS OF UNITY

WHERE DO WE GO NEXT? BUILDING INSTITUTIONS